These tables are intriguing, why are they present?

Hi @Kai , [RiskEvidenceSynthesis](https://www.medplum.com/docs/api/fhir/resources/riskevidencesynthesis) is a FHIR resource type. We have a tables for each different resource type

Where these come from in real life These FHIR resources are typically derived from: Cochrane Collaboration reviews U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations Clinical guideline bodies (cardiology, oncology, etc.) Large meta-analyses published in journals

Ahh, apologies if I misinterpreted your question here. Yea, it looks like these are not resources you author from > scratch but instead import from > reporting of biomedical research, systematic reviews, and clinical reference across all disciplines according to https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/riskevidencesynthesis.html Interestingly, the resource type gets deprecated in later versions of FHIR: > R4: RiskEvidenceSynthesis exists (Trial Use, FMM 0) > R5: Removed — superseded by Evidence/EvidenceVariable/EvidenceReport > R6: Not present > Would be an interesting hook w/ AI to make sense of the large datasets, because sometimes the experts disagree! Good point! Please share with the community if you test this out 😃